Skip to content


Sourav Ganguly Vs. Tata Tea Ltd. - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation

Subject

Civil

Court

Kolkata High Court

Decided On

Case Number

C.S. No. 361 of 1997

Judge

Appellant

Sourav Ganguly

Respondent

Tata Tea Ltd.

Excerpt:


- sanjib banerjee, j.1. the court: none appears on behalf of the plaintiff. the matter had earlier appeared in the warning list.2. it appears that despite notice the plaintiff has not removed the defects. it is evident that the plaintiff does not wish to proceed with the suit.3. c.s. no. 361 of 1997 is dismissed. interim orders, if any, stand vacated .there will be no order as to costs.

Judgment:


Sanjib Banerjee, J.

1. The court: None appears on behalf of the plaintiff. The matter had earlier appeared in the warning list.

2. It appears that despite notice the plaintiff has not removed the defects. It is evident that the plaintiff does not wish to proceed with the suit.

3. C.S. No. 361 of 1997 is dismissed. Interim orders, if any, stand vacated .There will be no order as to costs.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //