Skip to content


A.P. Manchanda and anr. Vs. State of Haryana and anr. - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation

Subject

Service;Constitution

Court

Supreme Court of India

Decided On

Case Number

Civil Appeals Nos. ... of 1994

Judge

Reported in

1994Supp(2)SCC45

Appellant

A.P. Manchanda and anr.

Respondent

State of Haryana and anr.

Disposition

Appeal Dismissed

Prior history

Arising out of SLPs (C) Nos. 788-89 of 1994

Excerpt:


- [a.m. ahmadi and; m.m. punchhi, jj.] -- service law — increments — advance increments for acquiring higher qualifications — g.o. stating that after reviewing the then existing scheme, the government directed the grant of advance increments to be applicable to the categories of employees specified therein and regulated w.e.f. the specified date -- in the order dated 24-5-1977, the government have stated that the existing scheme of grant of advance increments to certain categories of government employees for possessing or acquiring higher qualifications has been reviewed by government, in the light of the recommendations of the pay commission and the official committee. thereafter, the government have directed that the grant of advance increments would be applicable (to the following category of employees and be regulated with effect from 1-1-1977) to the designated four categories of employees subject to which they are entitled to advance increments ......the junior division grade ii and were within the specified scale of pay on acquiring graduation qualification would get two advance increments. the order of the government in order fd 14/srp(1)/77, bangalore, dated 24-5-1977 was only to elongate the benefits envisaged on the earlier notifications to such of those categories of the employees mentioned therein and they are also equally entitled to the benefits of two advance increments. the g.o. did not intend to exclude or take away the benefit of two advance increments on acquiring graduation qualification by any other categories. the tribunal has, therefore, committed illegality in construing that, by necessary implication, it excluded all others except those covered by the notification. we find no force in the contentions.3. in the order dated 24-5-1977, the government have stated that the existing scheme of grant of advance increments to certain categories of government employees for possessing or acquiring higher qualifications has been reviewed by government, in the light of the recommendations of the pay commission and the official committee. thereafter, the government have directed that the grant of advance increments.....

Judgment:


A.M. Ahmadi and; M.M. Punchhi, JJ.

1. Leave granted. Heard learned counsel for the appellants.

2. Learned counsel contends that the Government by its order dated 9-10-1964, while reading various orders issued by the Government of Karnataka starting from 27-12-1961, have extended the benefit of two advance increments to augment efficiency in service to such of those employees who improve their qualifications and acquire graduation qualification. Therein it was specifically stated that such of those employees who were in the junior division Grade II and were within the specified scale of pay on acquiring graduation qualification would get two advance increments. The order of the Government in order FD 14/SRP(1)/77, Bangalore, dated 24-5-1977 was only to elongate the benefits envisaged on the earlier notifications to such of those categories of the employees mentioned therein and they are also equally entitled to the benefits of two advance increments. The G.O. did not intend to exclude or take away the benefit of two advance increments on acquiring graduation qualification by any other categories. The Tribunal has, therefore, committed illegality in construing that, by necessary implication, it excluded all others except those covered by the notification. We find no force in the contentions.

3. In the order dated 24-5-1977, the Government have stated that the existing scheme of grant of advance increments to certain categories of Government employees for possessing or acquiring higher qualifications has been reviewed by Government, in the light of the recommendations of the Pay Commission and the Official Committee. Thereafter, the Government have directed that the grant of advance increments would be applicable (to the following category of employees and be regulated with effect from 1-1-1977) to the designated four categories of employees subject to which they are entitled to advance increments :

Sl. No.   Designation Qualification for which advance increments are granted No. of advance increments

1. Second Division Clerks/ Junior Assistants/Pry. School Teachers Degree 2. adv. increments

2. Typists i. Degree 1. adv. increment

ii. Proficiency in typewriting 2. adv. increments

3. Stenographers i. Degree 1. adv. increment

ii. Proficiency in Shorthand 2. adv. increments

4. First Division Clerks/First Division Accounts Clerks/Superintendent Asstt. Controller or Asstt. Accounts Officer               Cost Accounts examination of ICWA of India 2. adv. increments

4. It would, therefore, be clear that the Government obviously are aware of their previous scheme. After reviewing the scheme in the light of the recommendation made by the Pay Commission and the Official Committee the Government have confined the benefit of grant of advance increments to the categories of employees enumerated hereinbefore, that too with effect from 1-1-1977. In other words, the Government have chosen not to extend any benefit to any other categories except the categories enumerated above. Admittedly, the appellants do not come within any of the four enumerated categories. Thereby, the previous benefit existing from 1964 is no longer in vogue and superseded by the later order passed by the Government. Under these circumstances, we do not find that there is any illegality committed by the Tribunal warranting interference. The appeals are accordingly dismissed.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //