Skip to content


Rajammal and Others Vs. The District Collector, Nagercoil and Others - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation

Court

Chennai Madurai High Court

Decided On

Case Number

W.P(MD) Nos. 23902, 23905, 23940, 23957 of 2016

Judge

Appellant

Rajammal and Others

Respondent

The District Collector, Nagercoil and Others

Excerpt:


.....mohideen, learned additional government pleader takes notice for the respondents. 3. by consent of both parties, the main writ petition itself is taken up for disposal, at the admission stage itself. 4. the grievance of the petitioner is that the said application has not been considered so far. 5. considering the limited scope of the prayer sought for and without expressing any view on the merits of the claim made by the petitioner, i only direct the second respondent to consider the application of the petitioner, dated 6.10.2016 and pass orders on the same, on merits and in accordance with law, also by hearing any other interested parties, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6. with the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. no costs.

Judgment:


(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to issue patta in the name of the Petitioner for her property comprised in Re-Survey No.481/8 of Kallukootam Village, Kalkulam Taluk, Kanyakumari District based on the Petitioner's patta application Number: 2016/0105/30/017479, dated 6.10.2016.)

1. The Petitioner seeks for a direction to the respondents to issue patta in her name in respect of the subject-matter property based on her application, dated 6.10.2016.

2. Mr.T.S.Mohammed Mohideen, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents.

3. By consent of both parties, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for disposal, at the admission stage itself.

4. The grievance of the Petitioner is that the said application has not been considered so far.

5. Considering the limited scope of the prayer sought for and without expressing any view on the merits of the claim made by the Petitioner, I only direct the second respondent to consider the application of the Petitioner, dated 6.10.2016 and pass orders on the same, on merits and in accordance with law, also by hearing any other interested parties, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

6. With the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //