Skip to content


Rengasamy Vs. The District Collector, Thanjavur District, Thanjavur and Others - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation

Court

Chennai Madurai High Court

Decided On

Case Number

W.P(MD)No. 21787 of 2016 & W.M.P.(MD)No. 15570 of 2016

Judge

Appellant

Rengasamy

Respondent

The District Collector, Thanjavur District, Thanjavur and Others

Excerpt:


.....the appellate authority to find out the same and if he comes to a conclusion that there is a title dispute between the parties, necessarily the parties have to be relegated to the competent civil court to agitate their respective rights. needless to say that as against the impugned order, the petitioner has right of appeal before the revenue divisional officer and further revision before the district revenue officer. when such statutory remedies are available, filing of the present writ petition challenging the order of the original authority, namely, the third respondent cannot be entertained. therefore, this writ petition is dismissed only on the reason that there is an alternative remedy of appeal is available to the petitioner, without expressing any view on the claim made by the petitioner on merits. the petitioner is given liberty to file such appeal before the concerned revenue divisional officer, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. no costs. consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Judgment:


(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the 3rd respondent in Na.Ka/19371/2015 A6 dated 25.11.2015 and quash the same.)

1. This writ petition is filed against the order of the third respondent made in patta proceedings.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner contended that when there is a title dispute between the parties, the revenue authorities cannot go into the same and on the other hand, they have to relegate the parties to agitate the matter before the competent civil Court.

3. Needless to say that if there is any title dispute, it is for the appellate authority to find out the same and if he comes to a conclusion that there is a title dispute between the parties, necessarily the parties have to be relegated to the competent civil Court to agitate their respective rights. Needless to say that as against the impugned order, the petitioner has right of appeal before the Revenue Divisional Officer and further revision before the District Revenue Officer. When such statutory remedies are available, filing of the present writ petition challenging the order of the original authority, namely, the third respondent cannot be entertained. Therefore, this Writ Petition is dismissed only on the reason that there is an alternative remedy of appeal is available to the petitioner, without expressing any view on the claim made by the petitioner on merits. The petitioner is given liberty to file such appeal before the concerned Revenue Divisional Officer, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //