Judgment:
P.K. Das, J.
1. After hearing both sides, we find that appeal may be taken up at this stage of hearing of stay petition. Accordingly, after disposing of the stay application, the appeal is taken up for hearing.
2. Heard both sides and perused the records.
3. The Learned advocate submits that they have paid duty on the differential amount for subsequent revision of price after clearance of the goods. It is contended that appeal relates to demand of interest and penalty. Ld. advocate further submits that the present appellant was formerly known as Areva T and D India Ltd. It is submitted that the Tribunal for the earlier period dismissed the appeal on the same issue which was challenged before the Hon'ble Madras High Court. It is submitted that by order dt. 10.4.2012, the Hon'ble Madras High Court in MP.No. 1 to 1 of 2012 in CMA No.475 to 478 of 2012 granted absolute stay.
4. We find that the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of CCE Vs SKF India Ltd. 2009 (239) ELT 385 (SC) held that interest is payable for subsequent revision of price after clearance of the goods. The Hon'ble Supreme Court set aside the penalty. It is noted that the said decision was followed by the Supreme Court in CCE Vs International Auto Ltd. 2010 (250) ELT 3 (SC). In view of settled legal position, we set aside penalty and uphold demand of interest. The appeal is partly allowed. The stay application is disposed of.